Moving Forward on Malaysia-China BRI Project: Comment in Asia Times

PM Mahathir Mohamad speaks at a press conference at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, August 20, 2018 (Photo: AFP/How Hwee Young).

I was happy to add my to comments this excellent article by Nile Bowie in the Asia Times on the recommenced East Coast Rail Link (ECRL), a multibillion-dollar China-backed infrastructure project. This is an important political victory for Harapan, which has been working hard to convince Malaysians former PM Najib Razak’s Chinese projects were corrupt and overpriced. It also represents a step forward for the government in managing its relations with China.

The ‘China Factor’ in Pakatan Harapan’s GE14 Campaign

The proposed route for the Chinese Belt and Road-funded East Coast Rail Link

I recently published an article on Malaysia’s GE14 in The Round Table: The Commonwealth Journal of International Affairs. In it, I argue that Pakatan Harapan’s successful campaign rhetoric managed and redirected racialised voter concerns about ethnic Chinese Malaysians so that enough Malay Muslim voters were able to vote for Pakatan despite Barisan Nasional’s campaign rhetoric directed at the DAP.

The campaign targeted Barisan’s connection with mainland China and the CCP through the large Chinese projects around the peninsula, associated with Belt and Road Initiative, arguing that the 1MDB scandal and the taint of debt and corruption associated with Barisan was the “true” Chinese threat to Malaysia, not the DAP.

Race, Debt and Sovereignty – The ‘China Factor’ in Malaysia’s GE14

Discussion about China, Chinese projects, and the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) featured prominently in Malaysia’s 2018 election campaign, prompting widespread international debate since May about the new government’s foreign policy aims and direction. In contrast to views that Malaysia is now ‘pushing back’ against China, this article argues that China’s role in the election cannot be understood without considering the ways in which it was deployed by Pakatan Harapan (PH) to communicate with voters about domestic issues. Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad successfully used his opponents’ connections with China and the BRI to externalise voters’ concerns about ethnic Chinese political power in Malaysia, transferring these concerns on to the People’s Republic instead. PH’s campaign also connected Chinese projects with issues of debt and corruption, allowing Mahathir to portray his opponent, Prime Minister Najib Razak, along with the 1Malaysia Development Berhad scandal, as key sources of sovereign risk for Malaysia and Malaysians.

SCMP comment: A fresh start for Malaysia-China relations?

The Chinese and Malaysian flags fly at Tiananmen Square in Beijing (Photo: Reuters)

I’ve been quoted in this piece by Bhavan Jaipragas in the South China Morning Post, sharing some of my thoughts on Mahathir’s China strategy and the tone of relations between the two Asian nations.

As I mentioned, since the election, Mahathir has been keen to explain that the anti-China election campaign was not actually directed at China, but rather at Najib.

“The idea of resetting the Malaysia-China relationship so it becomes about growth and opportunity – as opposed to debt and corruption which he has associated with Najib – is appealing to voters who feel they’ve been going under, because of the pressure exerted on them by corruption, inadequate social protections, and the cost of living.”

Comments in the Asia Times: A Reset for Malaysia-China Relations

Malaysian Prime Minister Dr Mahathir at a press conference in Kuala Lumpur, May 10, 2018 (Photo: Reuters/Lai Seng Sin)

I’ve been quoted in this excellent article on Malaysia-China relations by Nile Bowie in the Asia Times, with whom I was very happy to share my some of my thoughts:

“Since the election, Mahathir and other government figures have been at pains to explain that the ‘anti-China’ election campaign was in fact directed at Najib, and not China.”

“China and Malaysia have invested in some heavy PR in recent months, promoting the strength and dynamism of their bilateral ties and mobilizing high-profile businessmen like Jack Ma to project the message that the two nations are closer than ever, and can reset their relationship to deliver wide bilateral benefits.”

“Mahathir has been speaking not only to China’s leaders but to his domestic constituency in Malaysia… (the Malaysian premier’s aim) is to demonstrate that he can return Malaysia to a policy of non-alignment and deliver a new era of prosperity, even in a climate shaped by heightened great power competition.”

Which ‘Chinese threat’ will win Malaysia’s GE14?

Campaign image by Invoke Malaysia circulating Whatsapp asks: “Quiz: Between these two uncles, which one gets a GST exemption?” Photo: Inside Story

Today Inside Story published an essay I wrote on the presence of ‘China’ and the ‘Chinese’ in the Malaysian general election, for which the official eleven-day campaign started this weekend. The government’s line is that the opposition, whose Democratic Action Party has a large ethnic Chinese membership, represents a risk of the Chinese takeover of Malay Muslim, and therefore Malaysian, sovereignty. The opposition parties are working to flip this argument so it hurts Barisan instead, by pointing to the external Chinese threat it argues resides in the People’s Republic of China, and its rise in the region.

One Malaysia, Two Chinas

Malaysia’s official eleven-day election campaign kicked off this weekend as candidates presented themselves for nomination ahead of voting on 9 May. The Merdeka Centre and other pollsters are predicting a win for Najib Razak and his ruling Barisan Nasional (National Front) coalition, hardly a bold prediction after thirteen similar wins stretching back to Malaya’s transition to independence in the mid 1950s. What makes this election different is a focus on the role of two Chinas — the Big China of development loans and foreign policy deals and the local Chinese community, which tends to support the opposition.

As it does at every election, the government has shaped the contest to minimise competition from the opposition parties, this time grouped in a coalition called the Pakatan Harapan, or Alliance of Hope. The short campaign and the weekday vote is designed to keep turnout low; revised electoral boundaries carry on Malaysia’s rich tradition of malapportionment and gerrymandering; and a new “fake news” law is clearly intended to constrain political discussion by Malaysians on social media and in the foreign press.

Not surprisingly, Najib himself has predicted an increased majority, not least in a recent interview with Bloomberg, his first with a foreign media outlet for more than three years. The PM’s boycott of foreign media began when the 1MDB scandal first erupted in 2015 with allegations that a state investment fund led by Najib had lost billions of dollars and racked up billions more in debt. The fund is still being probed in the United States, but similar investigations in Malaysia have found Najib innocent of all wrongdoing, and his UMNO party, which dominates Barisan Nasional, has closed ranks around him. Electorally and institutionally speaking, Najib appears to have his bases covered, at least within the country he leads.

The mood, meanwhile, wavers somewhere between indifference and insolence. When I asked political observers and insiders in Kuala Lumpur about the election recently, they responded with sighs and eyerolls before sharing their views. Beyond the capital, seasoned observers are reporting unusually silent audiences at the usually lively opposition campaign rallies known as ceramah, their faces unreadable. But this subdued reaction hasn’t stopped Pakatan’s campaign from circulating images of well-attended events accompanied by images of empty chairs at Barisan ceramah.

At one of Barisan’s events, to which taxi drivers were coaxed with a promise of free fuel cards to the value of 800 ringgit (a bit less than half the average monthly wage), the crowd declined to be stage-managed by officials, kicking over barriers and heading for the counter. Nobody seems to be performing as expected, except when they lament the spiralling cost of living. Food prices have soared, and the price of the widely eaten kembong — Indian mackerel, now seen as a cost-of-living bellwether — has more than doubled since 2015.

Read more

Why is there a Kuala Lumpur Terror Alert?

Nurul Izzah

 

Threats might not be containable: Nurul Izzah, vice-president of the People’s Justice Party, which this week announced a new coalition with the Democratic Action Party called Pakatan Harapan, the Alliance of Hope. Khairil Yusof/Flickr

Today, I updated an essay I wrote for Inside Story, triggered by the terror alert in Kuala Lumpur over the weekend.

Malaysia’s Flashpoint

With a terror alert issued and the country’s redshirts threatening to riot, Malaysia’s intractable political crisis has come to a head, writes Amrita Malhi

With a postscript added on 27 September 2015

As Malaysia’s Muslims celebrated Hari Raya Haji – the Feast of Sacrifice – this week, American and Australian authorities warned their citizens to avoid Bukit Bintang, the popular shopping and entertainment district in central Kuala Lumpur. Authorities were especially concerned about the lively Jalan Alor eating strip, which last night remained thronged with diners enjoying Chinese food. Singapore’s Straits Times immediately linked the terror alert to warnings from Indonesia that Malaysian Islamic State fighters are known to be training in Poso, on Sulawesi. Authorities in Singapore have also recently warned that terrorist activity is again on the rise across the region. To contain the threat that terrorists pose, Indonesia and Singapore both rely heavily on Malaysia – a major transit point for foreign fighters heading for Iraq and Syria, including from Australia. Yet with the nation’s new redshirt movement warning of a possible rally and race riot this weekend, the Malaysian authorities are themselves embroiled in a serious crisis with identity politics at its heart.

Read more

Scroll To Top