SCMP comment: A fresh start for Malaysia-China relations?

The Chinese and Malaysian flags fly at Tiananmen Square in Beijing (Photo: Reuters)

I’ve been quoted in this piece by Bhavan Jaipragas in the South China Morning Post, sharing some of my thoughts on Mahathir’s China strategy and the tone of relations between the two Asian nations.

As I mentioned, since the election, Mahathir has been keen to explain that the anti-China election campaign was not actually directed at China, but rather at Najib.

“The idea of resetting the Malaysia-China relationship so it becomes about growth and opportunity – as opposed to debt and corruption which he has associated with Najib – is appealing to voters who feel they’ve been going under, because of the pressure exerted on them by corruption, inadequate social protections, and the cost of living.”

2018 ASAA Conference: Race, Identity, and Malaysian Politics

The University of Sydney

I’ve had the pleasure of both chairing and speaking on a panel at the 2018 Asian Studies Association of Australia (ASAA) biennial conference, which was held 2-5 July at the University of Sydney. My talk was titled Race and the ‘Multi-Racial’: Malaysian Opposition Campaigning, 2008-2018, which I presented alongside some other excellent talks on politics and identity.

Big China vs local Chinese: Mahathir’s Clever Campaign Strategy

(Photo: Australian Institute of International Affairs)

Here’s an article I’ve written based on my presentation at the AIIA ACT Branch on 23 May, where I discussed Dr Mahathir’s historic election victory and how the winning Pakatan Harapan coalition flipped the ‘China threat’ on its head, separating in their campaign narrative the external ‘Big’ (or really mainland) China from local Chinese that are part of Malaysian society.

Flipping the Chinese Threat: How the Malaysian Opposition Won

Corruption, the cost of living and social inequality helped drive Malaysia towards a change of government on 9 May. However, these factors were already present when a strong push failed to topple the government in 2013. What changed in 2018 to allow the opposition to achieve this historic win?

Read more

Which ‘Chinese threat’ will win Malaysia’s GE14?

Campaign image by Invoke Malaysia circulating Whatsapp asks: “Quiz: Between these two uncles, which one gets a GST exemption?” Photo: Inside Story

Today Inside Story published an essay I wrote on the presence of ‘China’ and the ‘Chinese’ in the Malaysian general election, for which the official eleven-day campaign started this weekend. The government’s line is that the opposition, whose Democratic Action Party has a large ethnic Chinese membership, represents a risk of the Chinese takeover of Malay Muslim, and therefore Malaysian, sovereignty. The opposition parties are working to flip this argument so it hurts Barisan instead, by pointing to the external Chinese threat it argues resides in the People’s Republic of China, and its rise in the region.

One Malaysia, Two Chinas

Malaysia’s official eleven-day election campaign kicked off this weekend as candidates presented themselves for nomination ahead of voting on 9 May. The Merdeka Centre and other pollsters are predicting a win for Najib Razak and his ruling Barisan Nasional (National Front) coalition, hardly a bold prediction after thirteen similar wins stretching back to Malaya’s transition to independence in the mid 1950s. What makes this election different is a focus on the role of two Chinas — the Big China of development loans and foreign policy deals and the local Chinese community, which tends to support the opposition.

As it does at every election, the government has shaped the contest to minimise competition from the opposition parties, this time grouped in a coalition called the Pakatan Harapan, or Alliance of Hope. The short campaign and the weekday vote is designed to keep turnout low; revised electoral boundaries carry on Malaysia’s rich tradition of malapportionment and gerrymandering; and a new “fake news” law is clearly intended to constrain political discussion by Malaysians on social media and in the foreign press.

Not surprisingly, Najib himself has predicted an increased majority, not least in a recent interview with Bloomberg, his first with a foreign media outlet for more than three years. The PM’s boycott of foreign media began when the 1MDB scandal first erupted in 2015 with allegations that a state investment fund led by Najib had lost billions of dollars and racked up billions more in debt. The fund is still being probed in the United States, but similar investigations in Malaysia have found Najib innocent of all wrongdoing, and his UMNO party, which dominates Barisan Nasional, has closed ranks around him. Electorally and institutionally speaking, Najib appears to have his bases covered, at least within the country he leads.

The mood, meanwhile, wavers somewhere between indifference and insolence. When I asked political observers and insiders in Kuala Lumpur about the election recently, they responded with sighs and eyerolls before sharing their views. Beyond the capital, seasoned observers are reporting unusually silent audiences at the usually lively opposition campaign rallies known as ceramah, their faces unreadable. But this subdued reaction hasn’t stopped Pakatan’s campaign from circulating images of well-attended events accompanied by images of empty chairs at Barisan ceramah.

At one of Barisan’s events, to which taxi drivers were coaxed with a promise of free fuel cards to the value of 800 ringgit (a bit less than half the average monthly wage), the crowd declined to be stage-managed by officials, kicking over barriers and heading for the counter. Nobody seems to be performing as expected, except when they lament the spiralling cost of living. Food prices have soared, and the price of the widely eaten kembong — Indian mackerel, now seen as a cost-of-living bellwether — has more than doubled since 2015.

Read more

Review in Journal of Islamic Studies

The Journal of Islamic Studies has featured a review by Martin van Bruinessen of From Anatolia to Aceh. Ottomans, Turks and Southeast Asia, edited by A.C.S. Peacock and Annabel Teh Gallop.

My chapter is described as follows:

Amrita Malhi discusses an even more ephemeral Ottoman ‘presence’ in Malaya in the enigmatic appearance of an Ottoman or Republican Turkish flag (the ‘Bendera Stambul’) in the 1928 peasant uprising of Terengganu.

Griffith Review Panel at Adelaide Writers’ Week

I’m speaking on the Griffith Review panel at Adelaide Writers’ Week, as one of the authors featured in Issue 55: ‘State of Hope,’ focused on South Australia.

My panel is at 12pm on Wednesday 8 March, on the West Stage. More details are available on the Writers’ Week program.

Griffith Review Panel at the National Library of Australia

Image: National Library of Australia.

I’m speaking on the Griffith Review panel at the National Library of Australia, as one of the authors featured in Issue 55: ‘State of Hope,’ focused on South Australia.

The panel is at 6pm on Tuesday 21 February, in the Theatre on the Lower Ground Floor. More details are available from the National Library.

Time to Reform Multicultural Policy

I’ve had an essay published in Griffith Review, in a special issue called ‘State of Hope’, focused on South Australia as a testing ground for government-led social reform since the era of former Premier Don Dunstan.

I haven’t been able to participate in any of the nostalgia for South Australia’s past, having only arrived just as Mike Rann was replaced with Jay Weatherill. All the same, my essay addresses contemporary possibilities for new rounds of social reform, in this case in relation to how state governments “manage” the growing cultural diversity of their populations through the policy framework we refer to as multiculturalism.

The essay reflects on my experience organising InterculturAdelaide, a policy co-design workshop I convened in 2015, and of navigating the multicultural arena and the way it insists on assigning non-white Australians within discrete and bounded cultural silos. These silos are then targeted by political parties in their competitive quest to mobilise each cultural “community” as a supportive political constituency. Yet surely a focus on equitable interaction across purported cultural boundaries is a better approach for equipping Australians to navigate their own society and their increasingly multipolar region?

The essay, ‘Intercultural Futures: The Fraught Politics of Multiculturalism,’ is available for purchase from Griffith Review.

National Science & Innovation Agenda: Engagement and Impact

Image from the cover of the ARC NISA consultation paper.

I’m on a working group for the Asian Studies Association of Australia (ASAA) that has submitted advice to the Australian Research Council (ARC) on its pilot engagement and impact assessment exercise scheduled for next year. The exercise forms one component of the Australian Government’s National Innovation and Science Agenda (NISA), and earlier this year the ARC issued a consultation paper outlining its aims. The advice submitted by the ASAA working group argues that the ARC must define “engagement” in a manner that includes the Asian region, and that “impact” cannot be measured in terms of income alone.

Review in The American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences

The American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences has published a review by Philipp Bruckmayr of the edited volume From Anatolia to Aceh. Ottomans, Turks and Southeast Asia, edited by A.C.S. Peacock and Annabel Teh Gallop, in which I have a chapter.

Bruckmayr’s comments on my chapter are:

Amrita Malhi, in contrast, discusses how British colonial authorities as well as later western and nationalist Malaysian historiography failed to grasp, and have therefore misconstrued, the implications of the deployment of Ottoman caliphal symbology in anti-colonial uprisings on the Malay Peninsula. For the author, the Ottoman Empire’s symbolic relevance in the struggle against the British in Malaya represented neither religious fanaticism nor pious proto-nationalism, but rather resulted from the fact that during the first decades of the twentieth century, “nationalism had not yet established itself as the primary mode in which Malay Muslims expressed their counter-colonial desires” (p. 224).

Scroll To Top