Moving Forward on Malaysia-China BRI Project: Comment in Asia Times

PM Mahathir Mohamad speaks at a press conference at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, August 20, 2018 (Photo: AFP/How Hwee Young).

I was happy to add my to comments this excellent article by Nile Bowie in the Asia Times on the recommenced East Coast Rail Link (ECRL), a multibillion-dollar China-backed infrastructure project. This is an important political victory for Harapan, which has been working hard to convince Malaysians former PM Najib Razak’s Chinese projects were corrupt and overpriced. It also represents a step forward for the government in managing its relations with China.

The ‘China Factor’ in Pakatan Harapan’s GE14 Campaign

The proposed route for the Chinese Belt and Road-funded East Coast Rail Link

I recently published an article on Malaysia’s GE14 in The Round Table: The Commonwealth Journal of International Affairs. In it, I argue that Pakatan Harapan’s successful campaign rhetoric managed and redirected racialised voter concerns about ethnic Chinese Malaysians so that enough Malay Muslim voters were able to vote for Pakatan despite Barisan Nasional’s campaign rhetoric directed at the DAP.

The campaign targeted Barisan’s connection with mainland China and the CCP through the large Chinese projects around the peninsula, associated with Belt and Road Initiative, arguing that the 1MDB scandal and the taint of debt and corruption associated with Barisan was the “true” Chinese threat to Malaysia, not the DAP.

Race, Debt and Sovereignty – The ‘China Factor’ in Malaysia’s GE14

Discussion about China, Chinese projects, and the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) featured prominently in Malaysia’s 2018 election campaign, prompting widespread international debate since May about the new government’s foreign policy aims and direction. In contrast to views that Malaysia is now ‘pushing back’ against China, this article argues that China’s role in the election cannot be understood without considering the ways in which it was deployed by Pakatan Harapan (PH) to communicate with voters about domestic issues. Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad successfully used his opponents’ connections with China and the BRI to externalise voters’ concerns about ethnic Chinese political power in Malaysia, transferring these concerns on to the People’s Republic instead. PH’s campaign also connected Chinese projects with issues of debt and corruption, allowing Mahathir to portray his opponent, Prime Minister Najib Razak, along with the 1Malaysia Development Berhad scandal, as key sources of sovereign risk for Malaysia and Malaysians.

Panel Discussion: Malaysia’s Historic Election Result… what next?

Image: Ulet Ifansasti/Getty Images

I enjoyed being part of this panel hosted by The Lowy Institute’s Director of the Southeast Asia Project, Aaron Connelly, where I was joined by James Chin, Director of the Asia Institute Tasmania, and Kean Wong, contributing editor at New Mandala.

We discussed how the newly elected coalition will address fundamental social issues, such as those of race and ethnicity; the relationship between PM Mahathir and Anwar Ibrahim; the culpability of former PM Najib Razak with regard to the 1MDB scandal; how UMNO will adapt to life as the opposition; and what Malaysia’s change in government means for Australia.

You can also listen to the panel discussion here through The Lowy Institute channel on Soundcloud.

Article in The Interpreter: What’s Next for Malaysia?

Petronas Towers, Kuala Lumpur (Photo: David McKelvey/Flickr)

The Interpreter has published an article of mine that analyses the immediate post-election situation in Malaysia; as the country adjusts to a non-Barisan Nasional government for the first time, many decisions must be made by the new Harapan coalition government over how to implement the reforms Malaysians have shown they want. The defeated UMNO Party’s next moves are yet to be determined, while Malaysia’s new leader Mahathir Mohamad has announced to the world that Malaysia is open to most foreign investment. Mahathir is also moving fast to reinstate an investigation into now resigned UMNO leader Najib Razak’s connection with the 1MDB scandal, preventing Najib from leaving the country on the weekend.

Malaysia: what now?

Malaysians have rejected Barisan Nasional so overwhelmingly that the electoral system designed to protect its rule has been overcome. The party received its lowest popular vote in history, around 36%, and won only 79 seats in a 222-seat federal parliament.

The once multiracial coalition has been stripped back to 54 seats held by core party United Malays National Organisation (UMNO), with another 13 held by United Bumiputera Heritage Party (PBB), UMNO’s partner in Sarawak state. There is barely any representation left from its other component parties, including the Malaysian Chinese Association and the Malaysian Indian Congress.

On Sunday night, police cordoned off defeated former prime minister Najib Razak’s street, after Malaysia’s new leader Mahathir Mohamad stopped him from leaving the country on the weekend. Mahathir is moving fast to reinstate an investigation into Najib’s connection with the billions of dollars missing from Malaysia’s 1MDB development investment company.

The rout has been comprehensive. Before the election, however, Malaysians weren’t prepared to give their voting intentions away without a lot of careful prompting. Read more

A Narrative of Kleptocrats: East Asia Forum Op-Ed

Photo: East Asia Forum

Today East Asia Forum has published an op-ed that I wrote (which initially appeared as an essay on Inside Story) on the opposition’s narrative of Big China and reminding voters about the 1MDB scandal.

One Malaysia, two Chinas

The Merdeka Centre and other pollsters are predicting that the ruling Barisan Nasional coalition will come out on top of Malaysia’s election on 9 May. This is hardly a bold prediction after 13 similar wins stretching back to Malaya’s transition to independence in the mid-1950s.

One thing that makes this election different is a focus on the role of two Chinas — the ‘Big China’ of development loans and foreign policy deals and the local Chinese community, which tends to support the opposition. On Facebook and the encrypted carrier WhatsApp, the fracturing of Malaysia’s biggest and once-stable voting bloc — the nation’s majority Malay Muslims — is evident in debates raging in text and video about who is to blame for cost-of-living pressures: China or the Chinese?

Read more

Which ‘Chinese threat’ will win Malaysia’s GE14?

Campaign image by Invoke Malaysia circulating Whatsapp asks: “Quiz: Between these two uncles, which one gets a GST exemption?” Photo: Inside Story

Today Inside Story published an essay I wrote on the presence of ‘China’ and the ‘Chinese’ in the Malaysian general election, for which the official eleven-day campaign started this weekend. The government’s line is that the opposition, whose Democratic Action Party has a large ethnic Chinese membership, represents a risk of the Chinese takeover of Malay Muslim, and therefore Malaysian, sovereignty. The opposition parties are working to flip this argument so it hurts Barisan instead, by pointing to the external Chinese threat it argues resides in the People’s Republic of China, and its rise in the region.

One Malaysia, Two Chinas

Malaysia’s official eleven-day election campaign kicked off this weekend as candidates presented themselves for nomination ahead of voting on 9 May. The Merdeka Centre and other pollsters are predicting a win for Najib Razak and his ruling Barisan Nasional (National Front) coalition, hardly a bold prediction after thirteen similar wins stretching back to Malaya’s transition to independence in the mid 1950s. What makes this election different is a focus on the role of two Chinas — the Big China of development loans and foreign policy deals and the local Chinese community, which tends to support the opposition.

As it does at every election, the government has shaped the contest to minimise competition from the opposition parties, this time grouped in a coalition called the Pakatan Harapan, or Alliance of Hope. The short campaign and the weekday vote is designed to keep turnout low; revised electoral boundaries carry on Malaysia’s rich tradition of malapportionment and gerrymandering; and a new “fake news” law is clearly intended to constrain political discussion by Malaysians on social media and in the foreign press.

Not surprisingly, Najib himself has predicted an increased majority, not least in a recent interview with Bloomberg, his first with a foreign media outlet for more than three years. The PM’s boycott of foreign media began when the 1MDB scandal first erupted in 2015 with allegations that a state investment fund led by Najib had lost billions of dollars and racked up billions more in debt. The fund is still being probed in the United States, but similar investigations in Malaysia have found Najib innocent of all wrongdoing, and his UMNO party, which dominates Barisan Nasional, has closed ranks around him. Electorally and institutionally speaking, Najib appears to have his bases covered, at least within the country he leads.

The mood, meanwhile, wavers somewhere between indifference and insolence. When I asked political observers and insiders in Kuala Lumpur about the election recently, they responded with sighs and eyerolls before sharing their views. Beyond the capital, seasoned observers are reporting unusually silent audiences at the usually lively opposition campaign rallies known as ceramah, their faces unreadable. But this subdued reaction hasn’t stopped Pakatan’s campaign from circulating images of well-attended events accompanied by images of empty chairs at Barisan ceramah.

At one of Barisan’s events, to which taxi drivers were coaxed with a promise of free fuel cards to the value of 800 ringgit (a bit less than half the average monthly wage), the crowd declined to be stage-managed by officials, kicking over barriers and heading for the counter. Nobody seems to be performing as expected, except when they lament the spiralling cost of living. Food prices have soared, and the price of the widely eaten kembong — Indian mackerel, now seen as a cost-of-living bellwether — has more than doubled since 2015.

Read more

The Interpreter: Najib at the ASEAN-Australia Summit

Malaysia’s Prime Minister Najib Razak (Photo: ASEAN-Australia Special Summit 2018/Flickr)

An article I wrote on Malaysian social media’s response to Najib’s performance at the ASEAN-Australia Summit this month has been published in The Interpreter.

Najib makes electoral hay from ASEAN-Australia Summit

“Cak!” says the Malaysian meme circulating on Twitter since Monday. The Malay expression is often used with children, and means something like “Surprise!”, or, better, “Peekaboo!” In the background is a press photo from the ASEAN-Australia Special Summit which took place in Sydney on the weekend. In the photo, a smiling Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak stands shaking hands with an equally cheerful Australian Prime Minister and welcoming host Malcolm Turnbull.

The meme also features, and is a response to, an interview broadcast on ABC television’s The World the day before the summit, during which Malaysia’s former prime minister, now opposition leader, Mahathir Mohamad argued that Turnbull “should stay away from him [Najib]”

Read more

What is Dr Mahathir’s anti-Najib strategy?

Former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad talks to journalists in Malaysia’s administrative capital, Putrajaya, earlier this month. Ahmad Yusni/EPA, selected by Inside Story. 

Today, the excellent website Inside Story published my latest essay on the strategy and tactics of Dr Mahathir’s entry into Pakatan Harapan. I discuss the way the opposition parties wish to convert FELDA’s problems into a mini-1MDB crisis for rural voters in critical seats.

 

 

Malaysian Politics: Looking ahead to 2017

Image: Former US Attorney-General Loretta E. Lynch addressing Washington journalists over the Department of Justice investigation into funds misappropriated from state development fund 1MDB. Photo: Reuters/James Lawler Duggan, selected by East Asia Forum.

Today, I published a second op-ed in a series of two pieces featured by East Asia Forum, this time looking forward to how international developments might make life difficult for Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak, especially if they are capitalised on politically by the opposition alliance headed by former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad.

The full text of the opinion piece is below.

The international fallout from Najib’s 1MDB scandal

Author: Amrita Malhi, ANU

The international consequences of Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak’s handling of the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) scandal will likely continue to escalate. The affair concerns US$800 million from the development fund that investigators believe to have passed through Najib’s personal bank accounts, in addition to other funds believed to have moved through foreign intermediaries and investment vehicles.

Read more

Scroll To Top